Question No 18:
An organization's data stores are configured in a fully automated Storage Distributed Resource Scheduler
(SDRS) cluster. The v Sphere administrator determines that virtual machines are being migrated between
data stores even though the data stores look evenly balanced. On further investigation, the administrator
determines that the data store's utilization percentages differ by 2%.
Which Storage DRS setting should the administrator change to prevent the virtual machines from migrating
prematurely?
A. Edit the Storage DRS cluster settings to increase the percentage of the Space Utilization Difference threshold
B. Edit the Storage DRS cluster settings to increase the percentage of the I/O imbalance threshold
C. Edit the Storage DRS cluster settings to increase the size of the Space Utilization Difference threshold
D. Edit the Storage DRS cluster settings to increase the size of the I/O imbalance threshold
Answer: A
Thursday, 6 August 2015
Sunday, 2 August 2015
VMware and Microsoft are the top virtualization leaders, according to Gartner
VMware and Microsoft are the top visualization leaders, according to Gartner:
Gartner published its Magic Quadrant Infrastructure x86 server virtualization 2015. VMware and Microsoft maintained its place in the upper right quadrant of Gartner, which is reserved for leaders. Vendors that have been made in Quadrant niche players are Citrix, Huawei, Odin, Oracle and Red Hat.

Microsoft Hyper-V is increasing capabilities AzureThe report comes at a time when Microsoft is developing the next version of Windows Server, which includes a new version of Hyper-V. Compared to last year, Microsoft Hyper-V has moved a few notches in the upper right quadrant, indicating that the company advances its virtualization strategy. Tight integration with Hyper-V tools operating and management system, it is easy for customers to deploy and manage large workloads. Since the hypervisor comes with Windows Server, the cost is almost zero.Gartner, "the efforts of Microsoft to the ability of Azure as attracting interested companies to take advantage of azure and site management both Hyper-V and Azure services. There is growing interest in the use of Hyper-V for development teams based on Microsoft, in particular due to its affinity Azure ".Microsoft's game plan for building a private cloud platform that is compatible with the Azure public cloud pay; He stack recently announced Azure is a step in that direction. With the battlefield plain vanilla slowly virtualization to private cloud moves, Microsoft has consolidated its hybrid cloud strategy by reducing the gap between their platforms of public and private cloud computing.Once branded as only a Windows hypervisor, Microsoft has invested in manufacturing Hyper-V compatible with Linux; This helps the company to acquire new customers with heterogeneous environments. "Hyper-V will probably be more successful in the development of teams interested in Azure, but requiring local implementations. As Microsoft further enhances its affinity Azure support, and adds support for Windows containers in a future version, success with the development teams continue to grow, "says Gartner.Microsoft has a lot to do with their tools compared to VMware; Gartner found that their tools are not easy to use. Similar to VMware, open source technologies eat into Microsoft's visualization revenue.
RHEV as the basis for Red Hat CloudRed Hat looking at the third slot in the Magic Quadrant, after VMware and Microsoft. According to Gartner, Red Hat Enterprise Visualization (RHEV), based on KVM hypervisor has an adoption rate of 5% on the market. RHEV its integrated battery, Cloud Forms, Open Stack and Open Shift will penetrate the enterprise market. Citrix feels the heat of vSphere and Hyper-VCompared to its position in the Magic Quadrant 2014, Citrix has not made much progress with its Xen Server, Xen Desktop and portfolio Xen App. Given the adoption of Xen hyper visor provider market public cloud services, including Amazon Web Services, Citrix focuses on winning this category. Although Xen Desktop and Xen App enjoy widespread use in the segment of desktop visualization, the hyper visor back end is either v Sphere or Hyper-VThe company is also pushing its base Cloud Stack Cloud Platform in the enterprise market. Competition Open Stack and Cloud computing platforms based on commercial vSphere and Hyper-V allows a fierce battle for Citrix.Oracle, Huawei, and Odin found his nicheOracle VM, which is based on the open source Xen hypervisor, is preferred by customers who consider Oracle certification, licensing, and support. Gartner said that the third ecosystem for Oracle visualization is smaller than that of the market leaders, which affects its adoption.Fusion sphere, the visualization platform of Huawei, is making inroads in emerging markets like Brazil, Russia, India and China.In March 2015, Parallels, Inc., a hosting automation multi-platform, spin-off of its service activity in Odin. Given its wide containers experience, the company expects to acquire new suppliers of services to customers.What this means for the company ITWith Gartner indicates that 75% of x86 workloads are already visualized, most organizations believe that the next logical step: the implementation of a hybrid cloud. VMware vCloud Stack Air and Microsoft Azure are viable options for customers to deploy the hybrid strategy.IT company also evaluates the container rapidly evolving technologies. With the recent announcement of the container and cover open Foundation Initiative Aboriginal Computers, the focus is on the migration of a certain class of applications to containers. Traditional visualization vendors such as Microsoft, VMware, Red Hat, and investing heavily in technologies containers. The indicators of this trend are: investment in Microsoft Hyper-V Server and Nano containers; The decision to build VMware photon, a specialized operating system for containers; and the launch of Red Hat Atomic host.
Thursday, 30 July 2015
VCP550D Exam Question No 17
Question No 17:
A vSphere administrator needs to configure a virtual machine to meet a guaranteed CPU performance
profile.
Which configuration setting could the administrator choose?
A. Set the CPU Limit to High
B. Set the CPU Shares to 500MHz
C. Set the CPU Guarantee to High
D. Set the CPU Reservation to 500MHz
Answer: D
A vSphere administrator needs to configure a virtual machine to meet a guaranteed CPU performance
profile.
Which configuration setting could the administrator choose?
A. Set the CPU Limit to High
B. Set the CPU Shares to 500MHz
C. Set the CPU Guarantee to High
D. Set the CPU Reservation to 500MHz
Answer: D
Wednesday, 29 July 2015
Sunday, 26 July 2015
EMC Could Absorb VMware by Year End
EMC Could Absorb VMware by Year End:
EMC shares improved to overcome Market Perform.
We believe the risk / reward EMC (ticker: EMC) is more favorable in light of: 1) a reduction in risk estimates with reduced orientation; 2) the potential for a series of strategic actions of the company; and 3) improving the potential key results in 2016 thanks to strategic growth initiatives, revenue synergies of the federation and reducing costs.
While recognizing that the fundamental story is a little further, we believe that management could take strategic actions before the end of the year, which we believe could be a catalyst (the absolute best, in our opinion, would be buy-in VMware (VMW)). And while we might have been burned by shareholder activism, we believe all work essentially the strategic actions (for example, now occur independently of shareholder activism). Our 2015-2016 earnings per share estimate of $ 1.88 and going to $ 2.10, respectively, $ 1.91 and $ 2.13, respectively, and our portfolio valuation increased to $ 29- $ 31 from $ 26- $ 28.
2016 EPS should be around 12 cents, assuming strategic investments ramp as expected, having to $ 2.00 EPS. We expect an additional 10 cents a share buyback, the cost of the initiatives, and the heart of business to get our $ 2.10 estimate, implying a 11.6% growth year after year a reacceleration benefit. Our new valuation is based on about 12 times our estimate of 2016 free cash flow per share of $ 2.52.
EMC seems to have spent more time thinking about their strategy. Management was emphatic that swarm VMware would be a bad decision, which is considered a positive (and also categorically opposed to a spin-off).
[EMC has about a 80% stake in VMware.]
The final text may suggest that EMC has spent time thinking about their strategic options and other evidence, in our opinion, it is an apparent openness to the sale of secondary activities (which could help generate extra money) and the creation of the new tion the market organization (process a key issue of our, providers EMC and VMware competed against each other in the same accounts).
Although it may take some time to execute the ideas of logistics in action, we believe it is quite possible that the ads before the end of the year. While this may be somewhat smaller as other provisions, we believe a buy-in for VMware is always an option, in our opinion, the best strategic option synergies given material costs and more tightly integrated solutions to market potential .
We believe the risk / reward EMC (ticker: EMC) is more favorable in light of: 1) a reduction in risk estimates with reduced orientation; 2) the potential for a series of strategic actions of the company; and 3) improving the potential key results in 2016 thanks to strategic growth initiatives, revenue synergies of the federation and reducing costs.
While recognizing that the fundamental story is a little further, we believe that management could take strategic actions before the end of the year, which we believe could be a catalyst (the absolute best, in our opinion, would be buy-in VMware (VMW)). And while we might have been burned by shareholder activism, we believe all work essentially the strategic actions (for example, now occur independently of shareholder activism). Our 2015-2016 earnings per share estimate of $ 1.88 and going to $ 2.10, respectively, $ 1.91 and $ 2.13, respectively, and our portfolio valuation increased to $ 29- $ 31 from $ 26- $ 28.
2016 EPS should be around 12 cents, assuming strategic investments ramp as expected, having to $ 2.00 EPS. We expect an additional 10 cents a share buyback, the cost of the initiatives, and the heart of business to get our $ 2.10 estimate, implying a 11.6% growth year after year a reacceleration benefit. Our new valuation is based on about 12 times our estimate of 2016 free cash flow per share of $ 2.52.
EMC seems to have spent more time thinking about their strategy. Management was emphatic that swarm VMware would be a bad decision, which is considered a positive (and also categorically opposed to a spin-off).
[EMC has about a 80% stake in VMware.]
The final text may suggest that EMC has spent time thinking about their strategic options and other evidence, in our opinion, it is an apparent openness to the sale of secondary activities (which could help generate extra money) and the creation of the new tion the market organization (process a key issue of our, providers EMC and VMware competed against each other in the same accounts).
Although it may take some time to execute the ideas of logistics in action, we believe it is quite possible that the ads before the end of the year. While this may be somewhat smaller as other provisions, we believe a buy-in for VMware is always an option, in our opinion, the best strategic option synergies given material costs and more tightly integrated solutions to market potential .
Wednesday, 22 July 2015
VCP550D Exam Question No 16
Question No 16:
A vSphere administrator is unable to vMotion a virtual machine between two hosts. An error message
indicates that the USB device is not accessible on the target host.
What is causing this issue?
A. The USB device was not enabled for vMotion when it was added to the virtual machine.
B. ESXi does not support vMotion with a USB device attached to the virtual machine.
C. The VMkernel port for vMotion is not enabled for USB traffic.
D. The virtual machine has the wrong USB controller installed.
Answer: A
A vSphere administrator is unable to vMotion a virtual machine between two hosts. An error message
indicates that the USB device is not accessible on the target host.
What is causing this issue?
A. The USB device was not enabled for vMotion when it was added to the virtual machine.
B. ESXi does not support vMotion with a USB device attached to the virtual machine.
C. The VMkernel port for vMotion is not enabled for USB traffic.
D. The virtual machine has the wrong USB controller installed.
Answer: A
Sunday, 12 July 2015
VCP550D Exam Question No 15
Question No 15:
An administrator needs to create and provision new virtual machines from a master image that can not be
edited or powered on.
Which type of resource is most appropriate for the administrator to perform the task?
A. Full Clone
B. Linked Clone
C. Template
D. Snapshot
Answer: C
An administrator needs to create and provision new virtual machines from a master image that can not be
edited or powered on.
Which type of resource is most appropriate for the administrator to perform the task?
A. Full Clone
B. Linked Clone
C. Template
D. Snapshot
Answer: C
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)